Influence of the ionic strength on the physicochemical properties of methotrexate-loaded chitosan polyelectrolyte complexes

Abstract Polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) as drug delivery systems are widely explored since they are easily obtained by coacervation and biopolymers can be associated. However, particle distribution is a challenging critical parameter that has been infrequently focused. This work evaluated the effect of NaCl concentration on the physicochemical properties of PECs based on chitosan and hypromellose loaded with methotrexate. The particle size, zeta potential and polydispersity index (PdI) were determined by DLS, besides of drug entrapment efficiency (EE) and in vitro drug release profile determination. Particle size decreased while NaCl concentration rised, achieving a narrower size distribution of (345±79 nm) and PdI (0.285±0.067) with 200 mmol/L NaCl. The higher the NaCl concentration, the lower the zeta potential at acid pH. The EE was kept similar ((28.2±4.5) %) from 0 to 300 mmol/L NaCl, while 400 mmol/L NaCl impaired the drug entrapment. The addition of (200 and 300) mmol/L NaCl did not affect the drug release profile, but it was faster with (100 or 400) mmol/L. In conclusion, the addition of 200 mmol/L NaCl reduced particle size and PdI with no changes in the EE and drug release. Therefore, the ionic strength plays an important role on PECs development.

Evaluation of polyelectrolyte and emulsion covalent crosslink of chitosan for producing mesalasine loaded submicron particles

This study evaluates various techniques for producing mesalamine (5ASA)-loaded particles employing chitosan as a biopolymer: (1) the polyelectrolyte complexation of chitosan with phthalate hypromelose (HP), (2) the chemical crosslinking of chitosan with genipin and (3) the water-in-oil emulsion method associated with chemical crosslinking with genipin. Systems were characterized by dynamic light scattering, zeta potential (ζ), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and a drug release profile. Method (1) was efficiently produced unloaded nanoparticles (491 nm, PdI=0.26 and ζ = 23.2), but the conditions for chitosan and HP cross-linking enhanced the precipitation of 5ASA. Method (2) caused the degradation of the drug. Method 3 produced sub-micron and microparticles, thereby varying the agitation method; 3 h magnetic agitation resulted in 2692 nm, Pdi = 0.6 and ζ = 46, while Ultra-Turrax, 5 min produced submicron particles (537 nm, PdI = 0.6). The percentage yield was approximately 50%, which is very satisfactory considering the impossibility of encapsulating 5ASA using other methods. FTIR showed the covalent interaction of chitosan and genipin. The drug release was rapid in acidic fluid, but in neutral pH a slower release was obtained in the initial stage, followed by rapid release, which may ensure the controlled release of 5ASA in the colon.

Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems / Sistemas de entrega de drogas mucoadesiva

Drug actions can be improved by developing new drug delivery systems, such as the mucoadhesive system. These systems remain in close contact with the absorption tissue, the mucous membrane, releasing the drug at the action site leading to a bioavailability increase and both local and systemic effects. Mucoadhesion is currently explained by six theories: electronic, adsorption, wettability, diffusion, fracture and mechanical. Several in vitro and in vivo methodologies are proposed for studying its mechanisms. However, mucoadhesion is not yet well understood. The aim of this study was to review the mechanisms and theories involved in mucoadhesion, as well as to describe the most-used methodologies and polymers in mucoadhesive drug delivery systems.

O efeito de fármacos pode ser potencializado através do desenvolvimento de novos sistemas de liberação como os sistemas mucoadesivos. Estes sistemas permanecem em contato íntimo com o tecido de absorção, as mucosas, liberando o fármaco no local de ação, com o consequente aumento da biodisponibilidade, podendo promover efeitos locais e sistêmicos. A mucoadesão, atualmente, é explicada por seis teorias, a eletrônica, da adsorção, da molhabilidade, da difusão, da fratura e a mecânica. Para estudar seus mecanismos e quantificá-la, são propostas várias metodologias in vitro e in vivo. Porém, a mucoadesão ainda não é totalmente compreendida. Esse trabalho tem por objetivo revisar os mecanismos e as teorias envolvidas na mucoadesão, além de descrever as metodologias e os polímeros mais utilizados em sistemas mucoadesivos para liberação de fármacos.

Corrositex®, BCOP and HET-CAM as alternative methods to animal experimentation / Corrositex®, BCOP e HET-CAM como métodos alternativos à experimentação animal

Tests in animals are used as models in toxicological and investigative studies. However, such tests have been considered inhumane because they can cause pain and suffering to experimental animals, while these methods can often be subjective. Protests calling for animal protection have questioned the effectiveness of in vivo tests and suggest the introduction of alternative, in vitro methods. International organizations, such as the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), the National Institute of Health (NIH), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), that regulate and develop new alternative animal models, have indicated the running of preliminary assays and execution of sequential tests, which consider physical-chemical properties and data of in vitro assays, before performing in vivo studies. Towards this background, the objective of the present article was to select promising alternative methods such as Corrositex®, BCOP and HET-CAM, intended to refine or replace the use of animals and reduce their suffering.

Testes em animais são utilizados como modelos em estudos toxicológicos e de pesquisa. Entretanto, tais testes têm sido considerados desumanos, porque causam dor e sofrimento aos animais experimentais, porquanto estes métodos podem, freqüentemente, ser subjetivos. Protestos clamando pela proteção animal têm questionado a eficácia dos testes in vivo e sugerem a introdução de métodos alternativos in vitro. Organizações internacionais, tais como Comitê de Coordenação Interagências de Métodos de Validação Alternativos (ICCVAM), Instituto Nacional de Saúde (NIH), Organização para Cooperação Econômica e Desenvolvimento (OECD), que regulam e desenvolvem novos métodos alternativos aos modelos animais, indicaram a realização de ensaios preliminares e a execução de testes seqüenciais, que consideram as propriedades físico-químicas e os dados dos ensaios in vitro, antes de efetuarem estudos in vivo. Nessa direção, o objetivo do presente artigo foi selecionar métodos alternativos promissores, tais como Corrositex®, BCOP e HET-CAM, com o intuito de aperfeiçoar ou substituir o uso de animais e reduzir seus sofrimento.